Helia HR

Module

Career paths: grade ladders, criteria and promotion history

Write down what each grade actually requires, once, and let every engineer read it — including the grades above them. Promotions become a request with a decision and a date on the record, instead of a conversation nobody can reconstruct a year later.

€1per employee / month

The Helia career paths overview: six department ladders side by side — Data, Delivery, Design, Engineering, Platform and QA — each grade showing its level, salary band and how many people currently sit there.

What this gives you

The ladder, written down once

A ladder belongs to a department and holds as many grades as that discipline needs — five for engineering, four for QA, three for design. Each grade has a position, a name your team already uses, its own list of criteria, and optionally a salary band.

HR writes the criteria as plain lines of text, one per line, because that is what they are: a description of the work expected at that level. Helia does not ask you to score them, weight them or tick them off. A ladder is a published standard, and pretending it is a measurable checklist is how competency frameworks become theatre.

Everyone in the company can read every ladder. That is deliberate: a grade rubric only changes behaviour if the people it applies to can see it without asking their manager for a copy.

Who is where, across every track

One view puts all your ladders side by side with a live headcount on each grade — five at E1, eighteen at E2, nine at E3. It is the fastest read available on the shape of your organisation: a bulge at middle grade with nothing above it is a retention problem you can see before it becomes three resignations.

Salary bands sit on the grades that have them, and they follow the salary-viewing permission rather than a job title — someone without it sees the ladder and the criteria, and no numbers at all.

For companies preparing for the EU Pay Transparency Directive, this is the part that matters: the directive expects you to be able to describe the criteria used for pay and progression, and a published ladder with bands is most of that answer already.

Promotion as a request, not a corridor conversation

An employee opens their ladder, sees the grade above, and files a request for it with a written case. The HR chain gets a notification; the request appears in a queue.

Approving it writes a dated row into that person's grade history and tells them. Rejecting it requires a reason — a rejection with no explanation is the single most corrosive thing a career framework can produce, so the product will not let you send one. The employee can withdraw a request they no longer want to pursue, and only one open request per target grade is allowed, so the queue cannot be gamed by volume.

What accumulates is a history: which grade, effective from when, decided by whom. The employee sees their own progression; HR sees it per person and in aggregate.

A readiness shortlist, and what it is not

HR gets a ranked list of who might be ready, scored out of 100 from three inputs it names openly:

  • Time in the current grade — up to 40 points, full marks at a year.
  • Position within the salary band — up to 30 points, full marks in the top quarter.
  • The last manager review rating — up to 30 points.

Above 70 reads as ready, above 40 as building, below that as too early. When all three inputs are missing the score is unknown rather than a number — the model refuses to invent a figure it cannot support.

Three things this is not. It is not automatic: a human still files and approves every promotion. It is not visible to the employee — the score exists on the HR view only, and a heuristic shown to the person it ranks would be read as a promise. And it is not a substitute for judgement; it is a way of making sure the quiet senior who never asks does not get overlooked for the third cycle running.

How it fits with the rest of Helia

Career paths sits on Helia Base, which holds the people, departments and permissions it reads. It is priced per employee and is one of the five packs that collapse to the bundle rate together.

It composes with Reviews & Goals rather than depending on it: the readiness score uses the last manager review rating for 30 of its 100 points, and the AI growth plan reads current goals and 360° feedback when they exist. Without the performance pack the module still works — the score simply leans on the two inputs it has.

The AI growth plan drafts against the gap between someone's current grade and the next, and against their goals. Feedback is only included once enough people have responded to keep it unattributable, and the draft is edited and saved by a human before it exists as a plan.

Pricing for every pack, with a calculator, is on the pricing page.

Common questions

Can employees see the criteria for grades above their own?

Yes — the whole ladder, every rung, is readable by everyone in the company. Hiding the next grade's criteria from the person trying to reach it defeats the purpose of writing them down. Salary bands are the one exception: those follow the salary-viewing permission.

Does the readiness score decide who gets promoted?

No. It orders a shortlist from three stated inputs — time in grade, position in band and the last manager review rating — and it is visible only to the HR chain. Every promotion is still filed by a person and approved by a person, and a rejection has to carry a reason. The employee never sees a score about themselves.

Who can see an AI growth plan?

The HR chain — owner, admins and HR managers. Growth plans are generated, edited and saved there, and today the employee cannot see a plan written about them in the product. Worth knowing before you assume it is a self-service development tool: it is a management aid, and the conversation still has to happen out loud.

How do we get our existing team onto the ladders?

Two ways, both self-serve. One person at a time: their profile carries a Career grade card where the HR chain picks the grade, the date it took effect and an optional note. For a whole company at once, the employee CSV import takes an optional grade column — map it like any other field and everyone lands on their rung as they are created. A grade name the import does not recognise fails that row and tells you which name it was, rather than importing the person with no grade; and a grade someone already has is never overwritten, so re-running the same file changes nothing. Both routes write the same dated entry a promotion approval writes, which is what the ladder view, the grade history and the readiness shortlist all read.

Try it on your own data

Import your people from a CSV and switch this module on — 14 days with everything unlocked, no card required.

€49/mo minimum bill · 15% off with annual prepay · cancel any time.

Career paths — grade ladders & promotion readiness | Helia HR · Helia HR